Sculpture celebrating Max Bruch
City Hall, Cologne, Germany<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nMax Bruch, who died in 1920, seven years after the famously violent premiere in Paris’ Th\u00e9\u00e2tre des Champs-\u00c9lys\u00e9es of Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring<\/em>, is best known for his early Violin Concerto No. 1 in G minor, Op. 26<\/em>, a standard part of the virtuoso literature. As well, Bruch is known for Kol Nidrei, Op. 47,<\/em> a cello piece inspired by the solemn opening hymn of the Jewish Yom Kippur service. As well as being in the standard cello repertory, it is widely performed in some synagogues at the evening service which opens Yom Kippur. <\/p>\nBruch’s name sounds Jewish and his association with
Kol Nidrei<\/em> suggests that he was, but, in fact, he wasn’t. He was a German of Christian birth, and in fact one of his middle names was Christian<\/em>.<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
Bruch did compose a lot of other things besides the Violin Concerto No. 1 in G<\/em> and Kol Nidrei<\/em>, but none of them became anywhere as widely known as these two famous works, a source of considerable anguish for the prolific but somewhat overshadowed composer.<\/p>\nThe piece included in this evening’s performance is a selection of four parts from Eight Pieces, Opus 83<\/em>. Apparently, Bruch, like Brahms, had a particular clarinetist in mind when he composed these. In Bruch’s case, it was his son, also named Max. <\/p>\nDavid Finckel was the cellist in the celebrated Emerson String Quartet from 1979 to 2013. At the age of fifteen, he made his debut with the Philadelphia Orchestra in Tchaikovsky’s notoriously difficult
Variations on a Theme Rococo<\/em>. At the age of seventeen, Finckel became the first American student of celebrated Russian cellist Mstislav Rostropovich. Finckel and pianist Wu Han not only perform exquisitely together; they have been married for thirty years.<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
David Finckel, cellist, and Wu Han, pianist, have played together for a long time and their nuanced and collaborative spirit is in full evidence. David Shifrin, the clarinetist, fit in the mix admirably and seamlessly. As an ensemble, their performance was gently modulated and poetic in its rendering. From the delightful interlaced runs of the Beethoven through the plaintive tones of the Bruch to the sculpted passions of the Brahms, they played with Apollonian modulation and subtle sophistication while maintaining a sense of warm appeal.<\/p>\n
Notes from the performance –<\/strong><\/p>\nLudwig van Beethoven
\n
Trio in B-flat Major, Opus 11<\/em><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
Allegro con brio<\/em>
\nA measured approach to a lively opening. Delicate playing in transitional passages: beautifully clear fast runs. This is light<\/em> Beethoven. A noticeably more subtle approach in the repeat of opening section – beautifully done! Light and supple piano, with declarative passages not too harsh. Love those echoing runs! Development section also in major key – a bit of a surprise until it builds to a development in the minor. Haunting, lurking arpeggios build to bold declaration of original theme, with a brief echo of that original theme in the minor key. Sforzandos <\/em> are pressed but not punched – nice! The coda<\/em> breaks into a charmingly playful tease at the end.<\/p>\nAdagio<\/em>
\nA singing cello opening, which Finckel offers with measured grace, followed by Shifrin whose equally delicate approach delivers great gentleness. Wu Han’s lightly touched keys fill out the intro. A brooding development section yields dark and warm tones. Finckel and Wu Han weave together tonalities immersively in an internal duet, to which Shifrin adds with subtle highlights.<\/p>\nTema con variazioni (on “Pria ch’io l’impegno”)<\/em>
\nA jaunty opening! Wu Han’s liquid survey of the keys very much in evidence. Finckel oens a fugal interlude, sharing the festivities in delicate participation with Shifrin. When the clarinet breaks open the next section, it is with fire and verve. The piano introduces a meditative interlude, broaching pervasive quietude, out of which suddenly developsan energetic conclusion, but one which the adept trio shapes with moments of considerable delicacy. The earnest and guttural sequelae lead to a further series of variations, just the sort of light improvisations that Beethoven loved to explore at various points in his career. Wu Han’s persuasive piano pulls off a great syncopated coup leading the tow others onward to the delightful conclusion.<\/p>\nMax Bruch
\n
Four selections from ‘Eight Pieces, Opus 83’<\/em><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
VI. Nachtgesang (Nocturene): Andante con moto<\/em>
\nLovely opening sonorities in cello, with corresponding melody in clarinet play interestingly between major and minor keys. Finckel’s cello provides deep echoes with lovely surging tones. Again, the interplay of major and minor tonalities rises up, providing evidence of high Romanticism with a gently underlying warmth, while a plaintive Hebraic flavor is frequently in evidence. Are we really sure <\/em>that Bruch wasn’t at least part- Jewish? Though apparently not, his music bears interesting traits of Jewish sensibility, even when not thematically drawn to it as in the Kol Nidrei<\/em>. Some of the clarinet runs here sound like gently morphed versions of Klezmer music. A wonderful series of paired harmonic runs between cello and clarinet cap this sweetly plaintive opening.<\/p>\nII. Allegro con moto<\/em>
\nEmerging with a sea full of waves from the piano, the cello then gladly rides upon them, calling forth. The clarinet returns the call as though from a distant island.<\/p>\nIII Andante con moto<\/em>
\nA long, ferocious intro by cello has almost a dark, Hispanic quality. The clarinet emerges out of nowhere in a soft, hinting tone. The piano presses from below, almost levitating the clarinet with Wu Han’s gentle touch. The return of the fierce cello, like a matador, emerges: serious, intent, passionate. And, finally, a return to the measured reflection of the clarinet, like a religious call, leading to the placid and delicate ending.<\/p>\nVII. Allegro vivace, ma non troppo<\/em>
\nA scherzo-like opening from the piano is picked up by the other two. Suddenly this sounds more Classical than Romantic, a light, structured rebuff to the miasmic darkness which came before. It breaks into a playful, almost circus-like romp, and ends with a ferociously, fun poke in the ribs, uncharacteristic, in some ways, of some of that dark, moody seriousness which Bruch often offers.<\/p>\nJohannes Brahms
\n
Clarinet Trio in A minor, Opus 114<\/em><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
Allegro<\/em>
\nA warm and lovely opening by Finckel and Shifrin with the immediately seductive, iconic theme, the cello swooping down in anticipation of eventual pianistic rumblings. A wonderfully textured cello interlude follows. Thorughout, it is so evident that Brahms knows how to use these tonal colors, making exquisite use of each instrument, with a clear sense of their collaboration! Recapitulation in a slightly more animated context leads to rumblings of doubt which follow in the transition (Brahms was, after all, coming out of a deep depression), and then on to a heavenly reflection before descending back into rhapsodically passionate pangs.<\/p>\nAdagio<\/em>
\nThe clarinet opens in a sweetly plaintive mode, yielding tonalities among the trio that blend and fuse in a hesitatingly probing, but lovely, way. A return to the originating theme without embellishments leads to an even more penetrating sense of yearning than initially. The trio adeptly shows its stuff as it bends, shapes, and feathers its approaches to the climaxes, always pressing a subtle sense of yearning amid what could easily become pathos.<\/p>\nAndante grazioso<\/em>
\nA lyrical clarinet opens into an impressionistic interlude. Imagine a gathering by Monet’s lily pond, delicacy apparent everywhere.<\/p>\nAllegro<\/em>
\nAn intense and ferocious embarkation followed quickly by modulation shows interestingly how Brahms always mixes his moods – from intensely passionate to playful, to whimsical, to dark and reflective. This movement is a great example of that, a collage of sensibilities and tempers. But it all ends strongly, convincingly, its earnestness emerging almost from out of the blue, this adept and persuasive trio providing a durable embrace of conviction around an encyclopedia of emotions and sensibilities.<\/p>\n– BADMan<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Concert
\nDavid Finckel, cello
\nWu Han, piano
\nDavid Shifrin, clarinet
\nWorks by Beethoven, Bruch, Brahms
\nCelebrity Series of Boston<\/a>
\nJordan Hall, Boston
\nJanuary 15, 2016, 8pm<\/strong>
\nA delightfully nuanced account of an array of Romantic pieces for the somewhat unlikely combination of piano, cello and clarinet.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-22639","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-concerts","7":"entry","8":"has-post-thumbnail"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22639"}],"version-history":[{"count":38,"href":"https:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22639\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22764,"href":"https:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22639\/revisions\/22764"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"David](\"http:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Finckel_WuHan_Shifrin_Trio_CelebritySeries_2016_OnStage.jpg\")
<\/a>![\"Jackson](\"http:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/BostonPhilharmonic_Mahler6_Pollock_BluePoles_22.jpg\")
<\/a>![\"Sculpture](\"http:\/\/bostonartsdiary.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Finckel_WuHan_Shifrin_TrioCelebritySeries_2016_BruchStatue_25.jpg\")
<\/a>